Ong vs Abram

 "By contrast with natural, oral speech, writing is completely artificial. There is no way to write ‘naturally’. Oral speech is fully natural to human beings in the sense that every human being in every culture who is not physiologically or psychologically impaired learns to talk” (pg 81). - Ong


“...animism was never, in truth, left behind. The participatory proclivity of the senses was simply transferred from the depths of the surrounding life-world to the visible letters of the alphabet. Only by concentrating the synaesthetic magic of the senses upon the written letters could these letters begin to come alive and to speak.” (pg 86) - Abram


Two very different and contrasting ideas in these quotes


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Walter Ong (Assigned class reading)

Blog 8 Black Robe Video

Orality and Literacy - class reading